Good point but it's different if they are in the room. And if they seem inclined to want to have sex with me. I am very susceptible to flattery, even implicit, from a beautiful stranger. But no celebs so far have shown the slightest interest *spits*
forme the attraction is in the interaction. I used to have sex with strangers, but I at least interacted with them for at least an hour first. it how someone moves, speaks, laughs sincerely, moves their hands, holds their posture etc, that makes me find them attractive or not. And, I really only find people who chase me attractive, tbh horribly vain and blunt. And without that, I rarely feel sexually moved.
I think we are sisters under the skin, pthbbt. Though if they have indicated in some fairly reliable way that they fancy me (I mean physically, not just liking my writing or something) I might then
chase them. Ahem. It has been known.
I was really meaning in the context of the "sex with strangers" thread which I felt was about quick pick ups in the woods etc etc.
Yes, but even if I hadn't studied them for an hour or so in the way pthbbt described, it would be the interaction that would be the turn on. For instance, strangers on a train. I wouldn't just lurk in a tree in the woods and lassoo them. Well that would be a bit unethical, but I wouldn't have the inclination either.
As to 100% visual attraction - yes I have that but it is not particularly sexual. More aesthetic fascination and I do have it for some celebs, but it doesn't translate to 'want to have sex with them'. When I was at college and in the closet, I and another lesbian used to sit next to each other in college formal dinner and murmur things like 'Have you seen that Third Year Mathematician on the table left. Totally Pre-Raphaelite.' We were 1890s decadent and Oscar Wildean but it was all aesthetic
objectification in a rather pre-feminist, poncey way. Not really sexual. We never pursued any of these fancies.